Leverage turns a 35% fall into an 87% loss, and the fees arrive regardless

The main risks of buyouts are leverage working in reverse, illiquidity and layered fees, and tax treatment depends on jurisdiction and structure.

12 min read · Level 4

The point

I would rather see a manager explain their worst deal than their best one. The best deal shows what leverage does in a good market; the worst deal shows whether they understood what it does in a bad one, and whether they sized debt so a disappointment stayed a disappointment rather than a total loss.

What is it?

Return to the buyout: bought for 200,000,000 with 120,000,000 of debt and 80,000,000 of equity. This time the business struggles.

EBITDA falls to 15,000,000 Exit multiple falls to 8x 120,000,000 Debt repaid 10,000,000 remaining 110,000,000 Equity value 10,000,000 (120,000,000 - 110,000,000)

The fund's 80,000,000 becomes 10,000,000: a 0.125x multiple, an 87.5% loss.

The same outcome with no debt: 200,000,000 of equity, the company keeps 10,000,000 of cash and sells for 120,000,000, giving 130,000,000. That is 0.65x, a 35% loss. Leverage turned a 35% loss into an 87.5% loss.

If EBITDA had fallen further, interest payments could have breached the loan's covenants, letting lenders take control and wiping out the equity entirely.

Other costs and risks:

Illiquidity 10 years or more; secondary sales usually at a discount Fees management fee, carry, and sometimes fees charged to portfolio companies Concentration a fund holds perhaps 10 to 20 companies

Tax treatment varies by jurisdiction, investor type and fund structure: distributions may be taxed as capital gains or income, funds may produce annual tax reporting before cash is returned, and cross-border structures may involve withholding tax.

Why does an investor care?

Because leverage is symmetrical. The previous lesson showed debt lifting a 1.75x business result to 2.875x; this one shows it pushing a 0.65x result down to 0.125x. Investors who remember only the first half size positions too large.

Fees in private equity are charged whether deals work or not, so in a disappointing fund they take a larger share of what little is returned.

And because tax treatment depends so much on structure and jurisdiction, two investors with the same pre-tax result can end up very differently.

This is educational information, not tax or accounting advice. Rules differ by country and change — get advice from a qualified professional in your jurisdiction before acting.

Educational, not personalised financial advice. Nothing in the Investor Academy is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything — what is right for you depends on your own circumstances and the rules where you live.

Sources: U.S. IRS - official tax information; UK Government - Capital Gains Tax guidance; OECD - tax policy and statistics; U.S. SEC - Investor.gov

Example

Side by side.

Scenario EBITDA at exit Exit multiple Levered result Unlevered result Strong 30,000,000 10x 2.875x 1.75x Weak 15,000,000 8x 0.125x 0.65x

The levered deal gains 1.125x more in the strong case (2.875 - 1.75) and loses 0.525x more in the weak case (0.65 - 0.125). Across a fund of many deals, a few weak outcomes like this can offset several strong ones.

The common mistake

Remembering only the upside arithmetic of leverage. The same debt that magnifies a good result magnifies a bad one, and in the worst cases lenders can take the whole company.

How it works

Step 1: Run the downside case on a representative deal

Lower EBITDA and the exit multiple modestly and compute the equity result with and without debt.

Step 2: Check covenant headroom

Ask how far EBITDA could fall before a portfolio company breaches its loan covenants.

Step 3: Total all fee layers

Add management fees, carry and any company-level fees not offset, including feeder or platform fees.

Step 4: Get local tax advice before committing

Ask how distributions will be taxed, what annual reporting you will receive and whether withholding taxes apply.

When to use this

Before committing to any buyout fund or leveraged private equity product.

When not to use it

Do not apply generic tax statements to your situation; get advice for your jurisdiction and account type.

How investors actually did it

A recurring pattern: heavily indebted retailers after buyouts

Several well-known retail chains acquired in leveraged buyouts during the 2000s and 2010s later entered bankruptcy, with debt taken on at acquisition frequently cited in financial press and court filings as a factor that limited their ability to adapt to changing consumer behaviour.

High leverage on a business facing structural change removes the room it needs to adjust.

Do this now

Recompute the weak case with a 9x exit multiple
List every fee layer in one private equity product you are considering

Create a free account to read the rest and apply it to your own investing.

Related lessons

Leverage: the same asset, a different outcome — Borrowing to invest does not change what you own. It changes how far the asset can fall before the decision is taken out of your hands. (11 min)
A decade locked up, a fifth of it paid in fees, and a tax treatment set by the structure — The main costs of a venture fund are illiquidity, fee drag that compounds, and taxes that depend on where you live and how the fund is set up. (12 min)
Why two identical returns are taxed differently — Most tax systems care less about how much you made than about what kind of money it was and when you took it. Same return, different asset, different amount kept. (13 min)