Two legally distinct arrangements with different tax, control and IP consequences. Getting it wrong is a real risk.
A contractor provides a service, controls how and when they work, supplies their own tools, invoices you, and handles their own tax.
An employee works under your direction, on your schedule, using your equipment, with tax deducted at source and employment rights attached.
The distinction is determined by the substance of the relationship, not by what the contract calls it.
Because misclassification is a genuine legal and tax risk in most jurisdictions. If someone works full-time under your direction on your schedule, calling them a contractor does not make them one — and the penalties fall on the company.
And because the IP position differs. Employee-created work usually vests in the employer by default; contractor work often does not without an explicit assignment. That gap is the classic diligence killer.
Genuinely a contractor: a designer who works with four clients, sets their own hours, uses their own machine, is paid per project, and can send a substitute. Clear.
Probably an employee despite the label: someone working 40 hours a week, only for you, at hours you set, in your standup, using your laptop, told what to work on daily, for the last fourteen months. Calling them a contractor is a risk regardless of what they signed.
Why founders do this: contractors seem simpler and cheaper — no payroll, no employment taxes, no notice periods. The apparent saving is real until it is reassessed, at which point back taxes, penalties and potentially backdated employment rights all arrive together.
⚠ The rules differ substantially by country and change often. This is one of the clearest cases in this Academy for a short conversation with a local accountant — it is cheap and the downside is not.
First-time founders often classify by convenience and assume the contract settles it. It does not — authorities look at the substance of the working relationship.
The second mistake, and the more common one: not getting an IP assignment from contractors. Employee IP usually vests with the employer automatically; contractor IP frequently does not. A contractor who built part of your product without a signed assignment may own it, and this surfaces during diligence at the worst possible time.
The third: assuming the rules where your contractor lives are the same as yours. For international contractors, both jurisdictions can matter.
Who controls how and when the work is done? Do they have other clients? Whose equipment? Could they send a substitute?
Scope, payment, confidentiality, and IP assignment. Especially IP assignment.
Non-negotiable for anyone touching the product. This is the single most common diligence problem in early companies.
Yours and theirs. They differ significantly and change.
If a contractor has become full-time and directed, address it before someone else does.
A short paid conversation covering your specific situation. Cheap insurance against an expensive reassessment.
Before engaging anyone, and again whenever a contractor relationship deepens into something that looks like employment.
This does not apply to genuine agencies or vendors delivering a defined service — a design studio with many clients is clearly not your employee.
This is educational information, not legal advice. Rules differ by country and change — get advice from a qualified professional in your jurisdiction before acting.
Apply this to your own startup in My Full Journey (free account).