1. Home
  2. Free courses
  3. Thinking Lab
  4. Thinking methods
  5. State what would refute it

Thinking method · Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery

State what would refute it

Testing whether a claim is the kind of thing evidence could ever settle. Any theory, prediction or strategy you are relying on.

Free — no account needed to read

Testing whether a claim is the kind of thing evidence could ever settle.

The steps

  1. Write the claim out precisely enough that it could turn out to be false.
  2. Ask: what observation would show this is false?
  3. If you cannot name one, the claim is not making a testable prediction — note that plainly.
  4. If you can, go and look for it, rather than for confirmations.
  5. One clear disconfirmation is worth more than a hundred confirmations.

When to use it

Any theory, prediction or strategy you are relying on.

What it will not do

Unfalsifiable does not mean worthless — values and meaning are not testable. It means do not treat it as a finding.

Where it comes from: Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Described in our own words.

The module it belongs to

  • Critical Thinking — Evaluate claims and evidence

Previous: Methodical doubt

Next: Diagnosis, policy, action

This is part of Thinking Lab, a free course on My Full Journey. Reading every lesson is free with no account. A free account adds saved progress, private answers and practice with your own life in Thinking Lab. See every free course.