A startup is designed to grow very fast by finding a repeatable, scalable business under deep uncertainty. That purpose is why it behaves, fails and is valued so differently from an ordinary small business.
9 min read · Level 1
The word startup has been stretched to describe almost any new company, and I think that stretching causes real investment mistakes. Before evaluating anything, it is worth deciding whether the company is searching for a model or running one, because the right questions, the right funding and the right expectations all follow from that answer.
A small business and a startup can look the same on day one - a few people, little revenue. They differ in intent and design:
Feature Small business Startup Goal a sustainable, profitable business very rapid growth to a large scale Model usually known (a shop, a service) still being discovered Funding revenue, loans, owner savings often outside equity Growth expectation steady many times larger in years Typical outcome modest and durable large success or failure
A startup usually spends money before it earns it, betting that finding a repeatable model will justify the losses. That is why startups raise equity rather than borrowing: a loan needs predictable repayment, and a startup's future is highly uncertain.
It also explains the outcome distribution. Many startups fail, some survive at modest scale, and a small number grow enormously.
Because judging a startup by small-business standards - profitability now, steady cash flow - misreads what it is trying to do. And judging a small business by startup standards - explosive growth - misreads it the other way.
For an investor, this determines which questions matter: not whether the company is profitable today, but whether it is finding a model that could grow very large.
Educational, not personalised financial advice. Nothing in the Investor Academy is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything — what is right for you depends on your own circumstances and the rules where you live.
Two companies, both with 300,000 of annual revenue.
A regional accounting practice: profitable, growing 10% a year, owner-funded. A software company: losing 80,000 a month, growing revenue 15% a month, funded by investors.
The first is a healthy small business. The second is a startup betting that rapid growth will lead to a large, profitable company. Neither is better; they are different things, and they should be evaluated and invested in differently.
Evaluating an early startup mainly on current profitability, or expecting a solid small business to deliver startup-style growth.
Established models call for small-business analysis; unproven ones call for startup analysis.
Judge whether the company is designed for very rapid scaling or steady growth.
Use equity-style expectations for startups and cash-flow expectations for steady businesses.
When first encountering an early company, deciding how to evaluate it.
Do not force every young company into the startup category; many excellent businesses are deliberately not designed for venture-style growth.
Widely used definitions from startup practitioners describe a startup as an organisation searching for a repeatable, scalable business model, or as a company designed to grow fast, distinguishing it from small businesses that operate established models.
Growth by design and search for a model are the two features most definitions share.
Create a free account to read the rest and apply it to your own investing.