1. Home
  2. Investor Academy
  3. Financial Due Diligence
  4. Not every number called revenue is the same kind of money

Not every number called revenue is the same kind of money

Financial diligence starts by separating recurring revenue from one-off fees, bookings from recognised revenue, and invoiced amounts from cash collected.

11 min read · Level 3

The point

I think the most useful financial diligence question is also the simplest: how much of this will happen again next year without anyone selling anything new? Everything else in the revenue line is worth something, but not the same thing, and a valuation should know the difference.

What is it?

A startup's 'revenue' figure can blend several different things:

Item What it is Repeats? Recurring subscription ongoing contracted fees yes Implementation or setup one-off project fees no Usage or transaction fees variable with activity partly Bookings contracts signed, not yet delivered not yet revenue Pilots short trials, often discounted uncertain

A company reports 2,400,000 of 'annual revenue'. Diligence breaks it down:

Recurring subscriptions 1,500,000 One-off implementation fees 600,000 Signed contracts not yet started 300,000 Reported total 2,400,000

Only 1,500,000 is recurring revenue that is already being delivered. The 300,000 is bookings, and the 600,000 will not repeat unless new customers keep arriving.

Three further checks:

Recognised revenue versus invoiced amounts (deferred revenue) Invoiced amounts versus cash actually collected Revenue from related parties or unusual one-time deals

Why does an investor care?

Because valuations are often set as multiples of recurring revenue. Applying a recurring-revenue multiple to one-off fees and bookings overstates the company's value.

It also changes the growth story: a company whose growth comes mainly from implementation fees is more like a services business than a software one.

Educational, not personalised financial advice. Nothing in the Investor Academy is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything — what is right for you depends on your own circumstances and the rules where you live.

Example

The valuation effect.

Multiple applied to reported 2,400,000 at 8x 19,200,000 Multiple applied to recurring 1,500,000 at 8x 12,000,000 One-off fees valued at 1x 600,000 Adjusted value 12,600,000

The same company is worth about 6,600,000 less once revenue is correctly classified (19,200,000 - 12,600,000).

The common mistake

Accepting a single revenue figure without asking what it contains and how much of it repeats.

How it works

Step 1: Break revenue into types

Separate recurring, one-off, usage-based and pilot revenue.

Step 2: Separate bookings from revenue

Identify contracts signed but not yet delivered.

Step 3: Reconcile to cash

Compare revenue with invoices and with cash received in bank statements.

Step 4: Value each type separately

Apply different multiples or treatment to recurring and non-recurring revenue.

When to use this

Whenever a company's valuation or plan depends on its revenue figure.

When not to use it

Do not over-penalise implementation revenue that reliably leads to recurring contracts; judge the link with evidence.

How investors actually did it

A recurring pattern: ARR definitions scrutinised

Software companies and their auditors have repeatedly faced questions over how 'annual recurring revenue' is defined, since it is a non-standard metric not governed by accounting rules. Public companies that report it typically disclose their definition, and regulators have commented on the use of such non-standard measures.

ARR has no official definition. Always ask exactly what a company includes in it.

Do this now

  • Ask one company to split its revenue into recurring and one-off
  • Compare its revenue figure with cash received in the same period

Create a free account to read the rest and apply it to your own investing.

Related lessons

  • The income statement: what it claims was earned — The income statement is a claim about performance over a period, assembled under rules that deliberately ignore when the cash moved. Read properly it is the most useful statement; read literally it is the most misleading. (12 min)
  • When the cash and the profit disagree, believe the cash — Most accounting problems show up as a widening gap between reported profit and cash collected. A few ratios, tracked over time, catch the common ones. (12 min)
  • How a company makes money determines what good numbers look like — Subscription software, marketplaces, transactional businesses, advertising, hardware and services each have different margins, growth patterns and risks. The same metric means different things across them. (11 min)

Next: Runway is cash in the bank divided by what really leaves each month