A first meeting is for finding out whether the opportunity fits your thesis and whether the founder's claims are specific enough to check. Structure it, ask for facts, and leave with a clear next step.
11 min read · Level 2
The first meeting is where most investors learn the least per minute, because warmth is easy and specificity is awkward. I think the simple habit of converting every general claim into a number, politely and consistently, does more to improve early-stage decisions than any framework, and it takes nothing but the willingness to ask twice.
A useful first meeting has a shape:
Segment Time Purpose Founder explains 15 min what the business does, in their words Your disqualifying question 5 min the thesis test from your screen Specific questions 20 min facts you need to judge fit Their questions of you 10 min what they want from an investor Next step 5 min what happens after, and by when
The most informative part is usually how claims are made. Specific answers can be checked; general ones cannot:
General Specific "Customers love the product" "62 of 100 signups from January still pay" "The market is huge" "28,000 practices in this country at 2,400 a year" "We are growing fast" "revenue went from 40,000 to 65,000 per month since June" "We have strong interest" "nine letters of intent, four signed contracts"
Listen also for what the founder asks you. Founders who ask thoughtful questions about how you work, what you can help with and what your process is are usually running a deliberate process themselves.
End with a concrete next step and a date, even when the next step is a decline. "I will come back to you by Friday" is a commitment you can keep and they can plan around.
Because first meetings default to a pitch and a friendly conversation, which produces warmth and little information. A structure ensures the thesis test happens and the facts you need are requested while you have their attention.
Specificity also predicts diligence quality. Founders who answer with figures usually have systems producing those figures, which makes later verification faster.
Educational, not personalised financial advice. Nothing in the Investor Academy is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything — what is right for you depends on your own circumstances and the rules where you live.
Two first meetings, same sector.
Question Founder A Founder B Who books your demos? "mostly decision makers" "14 of last 20 were office managers" How is revenue trending? "really well" "41,000 to 68,000 monthly since March" Largest customer share? "we are diversified" "one customer is 22% of revenue" What do you want from an investor? "any help is welcome" "introductions to two named buyers"
Founder B gave a less flattering answer about customer concentration and was far more credible overall, because every claim was checkable. The investor asked for the underlying data and moved to diligence within a week.
Letting a first meeting run as an uninterrupted pitch, then leaving without having asked your disqualifying question or agreed a next step.
Tell the founder how you would like to use the time, so both sides prepare.
Put the thesis test in the first half, while there is time to explore the answer.
When an answer is general, ask for the number behind it.
Their questions reveal how deliberately they are choosing investors.
Commit to a response time, including for a decline, and keep it.
For every first conversation with a company you are considering.
Do not impose a rigid structure on a genuinely exploratory conversation with someone you are getting to know for the future. This is for meetings about a specific opportunity.
Investors commonly observe that founders who can immediately produce retention, cohort and pipeline figures in a first meeting tend to run companies with better internal systems, and that diligence with such companies proceeds faster because the data already exists.
The ability to answer with specifics is itself information about how the company is run.
Create a free account to read the rest and apply it to your own investing.