An investor's reputation is formed mostly by behaviour when companies struggle - down rounds, missed plans, founder departures. Founders and co-investors check it, and it shapes future access.
9 min read · Level 5
I think an investor's reputation is the sum of what founders say about them when they are not in the room, and that almost entirely comes from how they behaved when a company was struggling. It is built slowly, spent quickly, and very hard to rebuild.
Reputations are formed in a few kinds of moments:
Moment What people remember A company misses its plan support or blame A down round or bridge round fair terms or opportunistic ones A founder needs to be replaced respectful process or public damage An acquisition offer arrives honest views or pure self-interest A company fails help with the wind-down or disappearance
Founders increasingly check investor references:
'How did they behave when you missed a quarter?' 'Did they follow on when things were hard?' 'Would you take their money again?'
Reputation also affects signalling. If an investor known for following on declines to, other investors may read it as a negative signal about the company. That is one reason consistent, predictable behaviour matters.
Because the best founders have choices about whose money to take. An investor with a reputation for behaving well in hard times will be chosen more often, on better terms.
It compounds: good behaviour produces referrals, which produce better deals, which produce better outcomes.
Educational, not personalised financial advice. Nothing in the Investor Academy is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything — what is right for you depends on your own circumstances and the rules where you live.
A bridge round, two approaches.
A company misses its revenue plan and needs a small bridge round to reach profitability.
Investor A: offers the bridge on terms that give them a large new liquidation preference and a board seat, knowing the company has no alternatives. Investor B: offers a bridge on standard terms, asks hard questions about the cost plan and introduces a potential customer.
Both protect their investment. Two years later, the founder describes Investor B as 'the one who helped when it counted' in every reference call. Investor A's approach is remembered for a long time too.
Optimising each difficult situation for maximum short-term advantage while ignoring what it does to reputation and future access.
Write how you will behave in down rounds, bridges and failures.
Behave consistently so your decisions are not misread as signals.
Share concerns directly and privately.
Learn how your behaviour is experienced.
Throughout an investing career, especially when companies are struggling.
Do not confuse good reputation with never disagreeing; protecting your investment and being fair are compatible.
Venture firms increasingly describe themselves as founder-friendly in public materials, and founders and commentators have observed that such claims are tested mainly in down rounds, bridge financings and founder transitions rather than in good times.
Claims about behaviour are cheap. Founders check what actually happened in hard situations.
Create a free account to read the rest and apply it to your own investing.