Creative Thinking · Lesson 3 of 3

Reverse thinking, "what if", and useful constraints

When stuck, add a constraint rather than removing one. Unlimited options mostly produce the conventional answer.

6 min read · Free — no account needed to read

Reverse thinking asks the opposite question. Instead of "how do I get more customers", ask "how would I drive every customer away?" — then check which of those you are already doing. It surfaces things the forward question politely skips.

"What if" suspends one constraint on purpose. What if it had to be finished this week? What if it had to cost nothing? Not because those are true, but because each version forces a different structure, and one of them is often adaptable back.

Tight constraints help rather than hurt. Unlimited options produce paralysis and imitation; a hard limit forces a specific answer. If you are stuck, adding a constraint is usually more productive than removing one.

See it happen

You have a free weekend and want to do something worth remembering. You end up doing nothing.

The read that arrives on its own

Nothing in particular appealed, so nothing got decided. Maybe next weekend.

The same situation, with this idea

Add a constraint: it has to cost under 20, be within an hour of here, and be something you have never done. Suddenly there are six candidates, and they are all more interesting than the unlimited version.

What changed

Unlimited options mostly produce the conventional answer or none at all. The constraint did not narrow the search — it gave it edges to push against.

The takeaway

When stuck, add a constraint rather than removing one. Unlimited options mostly produce the conventional answer.

Easy to take the wrong way

Picking a constraint that quietly encodes the answer you wanted. A useful constraint should rule out something you would otherwise have chosen.

Try this

Ask how you would guarantee failure at something you care about. Check which of those you are doing.