The feature that was really a support problem

Six weeks of engineering went into the most-requested feature. Usage was under 2%, and the underlying complaint had nothing to do with it.

This is an anonymised composite, not a report about a named company. The situation and numbers are typical rather than reported.

Where they were

A scheduling product for small clinics, $30k MRR, one product engineer and two founders.

The problem

'Bulk reschedule' was comfortably the most requested feature — 34 requests in a quarter, more than double the next item.

The decision

Whether request volume was enough to justify six weeks of their only engineer.

What was on the table

What they chose

They built it. Six weeks, polished, well tested. The reasoning was that thirty-four paying customers asking for the same thing is about as clear as product signal gets.

What happened

Usage settled under 2% of accounts in the first month and never rose.

When they finally called the requesters, the pattern was immediate: nearly all of them were rescheduling in bulk because a clinician had called in sick, and what they actually wanted was for the system to notify the affected patients. The rescheduling was the workaround, not the need. They had built the workaround, faster.

The notification feature took nine days and is now used by roughly 60% of accounts.

What transfers

More case studies